刊物信息 more
下载专区 more
友情链接 more
访问统计 more
  1. 您是第 11725603位浏览者

您当前的位置:首页正文

自我效能在临床护士压力性损伤知识与预防态度间的中介效应 [中文引用][英文引用]

作者:王凤娟  陈亚丹  陈付红  王跃滨  
作者(英文):Wang Fengjuan, Chen Yadan, Chen Fuhong, Wang Yuebin
单位(英文): 
关键词(英文): 
分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2026·25·第745-52
DOI: 0
-----摘要:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

目的  探讨临床护士压力性损伤知识、预防态度与自我效能 3 者间的相互关系,并检验自我效能在压力性损伤知识与预防态度间的中介作用。方法  采用便利抽样法,于 2024 年 9 月— 10 月,选取厦门市某 3 所三级甲等综合医院 402 名临床护士作为研究对象。采用一般资料调查表、中文版压力性损伤预防态度量表(Chinese version of attitude towards pressure ulcerprevention,C-APUP)、中文版压力性损伤知识评估工具(Chinese version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool,C-PUKAT)和护士管理压力性损伤自我效能量表(pressure injury management self-efficacy scale for nurses,PIMSES)进行调查。采用 Pearson相关分析临床护士压力性损伤预防态度、知识及自我效能的相关性;采用分层回归分析临床护士压力性损伤预防态度的影响因素;采用 AMOS29.0 软件构建以压力性损伤知识为自变量、自我效能为中介变量、压力性损伤预防态度为因变量的中介效应模型,并通过 Bootstrap 法进行中介效应检验。结果  402 名护士完成研究。临床护士压力性损伤预防态度总分(41.69±5.21)分,得分率为 80.17%;知识总分(8.40±2.69)分,正确率为 42.00%;自我效能总分(122.69±22.42)分。临床护士压力性损伤预防态度与压力性损伤知识呈正相关(r=0.298,P<0.01),与自我效能呈正相关(r=0.474,P<0.01),自我效能与压力性损伤知识呈正相关(r=0.254,P<0.01)。压力性损伤知识和自我效能是压力性损伤态度的影响因素(β=0.259,P<0.001;β=0.378,P<0.001)。自我效能在临床护士压力性损伤知识与预防态度间存在中介效应,效应值为 0.096,占总效应的 27.04%。结论  临床护士对压力性损伤预防持积极态度,自我效能良好,但压力性损伤知识不足。自我效能在压力性损伤知识与预防态度间存在中介效应。

-----英文摘要:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Objective To identify the relationships among clinical nurses’knowledge and attitudes and self-efficacy regarding prevention of pressure injury(PI),and to examine the mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between the knowledge of and attitudes toward PI prevention. Methods A convenience sample of 402 clinical nurses was recruited from three tertiary hospitals in Xiamen City between September and October 2024. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire,the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention scale(Chinese version,C-APUP),Chinese version pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool(C-PUKAT), and the pressure injury management self-efficacy scale for nurses(PIMSES). Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships among nurses’attitudes toward PI prevention,knowledge,and self-efficacy. Hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors influencing nurses’attitudes toward PI prevention. Amos 29.0 software was applied to establish a structured model with knowledge as the independent variable,self-efficacy as the mediator,and attitude as the dependent variable. The mediating effect of self-efficacy was then tested using the Bootstrap method. Results Totally 402 nurseds finished the study. The total score of attitudes to PI prevention among clinical nurses was 41.69±5.21,with a score rate of 80.17%;the total score of knowledge was 8.40±2.69, with a correct rate of 42.00%;and the total score of self-efficacy was 122.69±22.42. Attitudes toward PI prevention were positively correlated with PI knowledge(r=0.298,P<0.01),and with self-efficacy(r=0.474,P<0.01);self-efficacy was positively correlated with PI knowledge(r=0.254,P<0.01). Both PI knowledge and self-efficacy were the factors influencing the attitudes toward PI(β=0.259, P<0.001;β=0.378,P<0.001). Self-efficacy mediated the relationship between PI knowledge and PI prevention attitudes among clinical nurses,with a mediation effect of 0.096,accounting for 27.04% of the total effect. Conclusion Clinical nurses demonstrate positive attitudes toward PI prevention with high self-efficacy,but exhibit insufficient knowledge about PI. Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between the knowledge and attitudes towards PI prevention.

-----参考文献:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

欢迎阅读《现代临床护理杂志》!您是该文第 9 位读者!

若需在您的论文中引用此文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文著录格式: 王凤娟,陈亚丹,陈付红,王跃滨.自我效能在临床护士压力性损伤知识与预防态度间的中介效应.现代临床护理杂志.2026;25(7):45-52.
英文著录格式: Wang,Fengjuan,,Chen,Yadan,,Chen,Fuhong,,Wang,Yuebin.Mediating effect of self-efficacy in clinical nurses on the knowledge and attitude toward prevention of pressure injury.Modern Clinical Nursing.2026;25(7):45-52.

与该文相关的文章(仅限于本刊内

已投本刊未发表相似文章