刊物信息 more
下载专区 more
友情链接 more
访问统计 more
  1. 您是第 8810338位浏览者

您当前的位置:首页正文

脊髓损伤自我护理量表的汉化与信度、效度检验 [中文引用][英文引用]

作者:王凡  申颖  冀晓瑜  赵雨亭  张孟利  宋艳  
作者(英文):Wang Fan, Shen Ying, Ji Xiaoyu, Zhao Yuting, Zhang Mengli, Song Yan
单位(英文): 
关键词(英文): 
分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·24·第1018-23
DOI: 0
-----摘要:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

目的  汉化脊髓损伤自我护理量表(self-care in spinal cord injuries inventory,SC-SCII),并对其进行信度、效度检验,为医护人员评估脊髓损伤(spinal cord injury,SCI)患者的自我护理行为提供测量工具。方法  2023 年 12 月至 2024 年 1 月运用 Brislin 翻译模型对量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适及预调查,形成中文版 SC-SCII。采用便利抽样法,选取 2024 年 1 月—2025 年 3 月在西安市某 3 所三级甲等综合医院就诊的 207 例 SCI 患者实施调查,检验量表的信度和效度。结果  202 例患者完成研究。中文版 SC-SCII 包含 4 个维度,35 个条目,与源量表结构一致。量表水平的内容效度指数 0.948,条目水平的内容效度指数 0.912~1.000。通过探索性因子分析提取出 4 个公因子,分别为自我护理维持(12 个条目)、自我护理监测(8 个条目)、自我护理管理(8 个条目)和自我护理自我效能(7 个条目),累计方差贡献率 61.402%。量表总的 Cronbach α 系数为 0.820,4个维度的 Cronbach α 系数分别为 0.935、0.905、0.921 和 0.892,折半信度为 0.798;2w 后重测信度为 0.875,且配对 t 检验两次测量结果得分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),提示该量表具有较好的跨时间稳定性。结论  中文版 SC-SCII 具有良好的信度和效度,可作为 SCI 患者自我护理能力的评估工具。

-----英文摘要:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Objective To translate self-care in spinal cord injuries inventory(SC-SCII)into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity,therefore to provide medical staff with a tool for evaluation of self-care behaviour of patients. Methods Brislin translation model was adopted for forward translation,back-translation,cultural adaptation and pilot testing in the development of Chinese version of SC-SCII. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 207 patients with spinal cord injury(SCI)from three Tier-IIIA hospitals in Xi'an between January 2024 and March 2025 for the purpose of assessing the reliability and validity of the translated inventory. Results A total of 202 patients completed the study. The finalised Chinese version of SC-SCII encompassed 4 dimensions with a total of 35 items, with the same structure as the original SC-SCII. Scale-level content validity index was 0.948,and the item-level content validity indices ranged from 0.912 to 1.000. Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis:self-care maintenance(12 items),selfcare monitoring(8 items),self-care management(8 items)and self-care self-efficacy(7 items),cumulatively accounting for 61.402% of the total variance. The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.820 and the Cronbach’s α coefficients of the four dimensions were 0.935, 0.905,0.921 and 0.892,respectively. The split-half reliability was 0.798,and the two-week retest reliability was 0.875. No statistically significant difference was observed between the original and sinicised scales(paired t-test,P>0.05),indicating a high cross-time stability of the sinicised scale. Conclusion The Chinese version of SC-SCII demonstrates a good reliability and validity,making it a suitable tool in evaluation of self-care abilities in SCI patients.

-----参考文献:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

欢迎阅读《现代临床护理杂志》!您是该文第 31 位读者!

若需在您的论文中引用此文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文著录格式: 王凡,申颖,冀晓瑜,赵雨亭,张孟利,宋艳.脊髓损伤自我护理量表的汉化与信度、效度检验.现代临床护理杂志.2025;24(10):18-23.
英文著录格式: Wang,Fan,,Shen,Ying,,Ji,Xiaoyu,,Zhao,Yuting,,Zhang,Mengli,,Song,Yan.Self-care in spinal cord injuries inventory: sinicization and validation.Modern Clinical Nursing.2025;24(10):18-23.

与该文相关的文章(仅限于本刊内

已投本刊未发表相似文章